
Buy it here:
Synopsis:
New York Times bestselling author Steven Kotler crafts a near-future thriller about the evolution of empathy.
Hard to say when the human species fractured exactly. Harder to say when this new talent arrived. But Lion Zorn is the first of his kind–an empathy tracker, an emotional soothsayer, with a felt sense for the future of the we. In simpler terms, he can spot cultural shifts and trends before they happen.
It’s a useful skill for a certain kind of company.
Arctic Pharmaceuticals is that kind of company. But when a routine em-tracking job leads to the discovery of a gruesome murder, Lion finds himself neck-deep in a world of eco-assassins, soul hackers and consciousness terrorists. But what the man really needs is a nap.
A unique blend of cutting-edge technology and traditional cyberpunk, Last Tango in Cyberspace explores hot topics like psychology, neuroscience, technology, as well as ecological and animal rights issues. The world created in Last Tango is based very closely on our world about five years from now, and all technology in the book either exists in labs or is rumored to exist. With its electrifying sentences, subtle humor, and an intriguing main character, readers are sure to find something that resonates with them in this groundbreaking cyberpunk science fiction thriller.
Review:
Two days ago, while I was finishing up the last few pages of Last Tango in Cyberspace by Steven Kotler, Literary Hub published an essay by Naomi S. Baron titled “No Matter How Much Great Literature We Feed Into AI, It Cannot Feel”.
In the article, Baron proposes that many readers of books, particularly fiction, develop more empathy toward everything around them (which is also a personal thing that can be developed with work and not automatically depending on the reader) and since AI cannot express any sort of emotional depth, the literature that uses AI (including any use of synopsis of a great work of literature) cannot express what feelings a story might stir in the reader. I can read the highlights of Frankenstein compiled by AI, can know the entire synopsis from beginning to end and not understand the feelings that the words on the page evokes in the reader. AI strips emotion from all reading and writing.
This has an interesting tie-in with Last Tango In Cyberspace because the main character, Judah “Lion” Zorn is an “em-tracker”. His brain has been neuro-wired and trained to understand culture and the trends that are happening and yet to happen. He cannot exactly predict the future, but he has a better understanding of how people are working and what anyone’s next move might be. He is offered a job by Arctic, a major technology corporation, to investigate what happened to Robert Walker, a big game hunter who’s head has been found taxidermized and mounted to the wall of his den. The journey that Judah goes through to find out what happened to Walker and why Arctic has so much interest in this killing feels a great deal like one of the recent Thomas Pynchon detective novels. Kotler has written a pulpy mystery story with a science fiction (but more science fact) slant, fueled by drugs, sex, and a heavy dose of Frank Herbert’s Dune. There is so much Dune influence as well as the constant back and forth between Judah and his friend Lorenzo that sometimes is nothing more than lines from the movie Apocalypse Now. Last Tango in Cyberspace ends up being a science-based detective novel mashed with tons of pop culture references (including Rainer Marie Rilke, William James, Banksy, the origins of Rastafarianism, Joan Didion, and of course Infinite Jest), and even a few history lessons thrown in for good measure. It seems like this would make Last Tango in Cyberspace an unfocused mess, but the truth is that it becomes a net that is meshed together and holds the clues to the mystery.
The idea of the de-evolution of empathy does come up a great deal in Last Tango In Cyberspace considering Judah is an “em-tracker”, someone who has honed in his empathy to be able to read people and situations before they fully develop. In this world, this skill has become rare enough to where he is hired at high prices for jobs. One of the things he explains toward the end is that empathy is not something you develop to help yourself. It is developed to help a whole community, to learn to work with others, and to build a better and more caring world. This idealistic feeling in Last Tango in Cyberspace is also one that is fairly relevant today as most people have completely stopped trying to understand people with different beliefs and opinions. Our communities are divided when we should be developing communities that are beneficial to every type of person instead of using individual feelings to tear them apart. I feel like this novel brings up many interesting questions and explores some interesting ideas, and I know I will be thinking about this book for a long time. This is by far the best book I read this month.
Personally I love the questions that have been raised by Last Tango in Cyberspace and Naomi S. Baron’s essay because these are things I enjoy thinking about. I agree that a great deal of my empathy and emotional depth has come from reading a large amount and variety of books. Not every book I read is for me. I am not always the target demographic, but I will say that reading gives me a better grasp on other cultures, histories, religions, sexual genders, sexual orientations, and the problems that arise in the world that might never affect me personally. Just because I am not the target demographic for a story, it does not mean I should ignore it. Instead I should try to learn something from it. When I read a novel that is not for me but for the transgender teen that is struggling with their true identity or for the person of color who is fighting racism and microaggressions in their workplace or for people who have a thousand other issues that do not affect my life as a late 40s cis white male, I can recognize this, still enjoy the novel, and learn something. Reading books that are not for me helps me grow as a respectful human who accepts and appreciates the people in the community who are not like me. However, reading also glaringly shines a light on so many people who live with hatred in their hearts. Right now people are showing how much they actually lack empathy toward marginalized groups. These hateful people are guided by feelings and fears and are convinced they are the only ones who are valid. Every day I meet hateful people or see hateful comments on social media. The first question I want to ask anyone who is being ugly to another person online is, “How many books did you read last year?” I firmly believe that reading literature changes most people for the better, and this is why the divide is growing between those who want to build communities and those who want to only look out for themselves. There is a decline in the average person reading a single book, and with AI development and emotional depth getting more and more shallow, more people are losing their empathy.








